
For my first part in a series about the myths and folklore of the world (which I'd love to eventually include something on Basque myth, the Arabian Nights, Christian Europe, and Greece), I'd like to tackle the fascinating traditions of Finland.
Often, I'm asked how Finn myth is different from their neighbors, the Scandinavians and Slavs.
First, the main hero of Finnish mythology is Väinämöinen, a rascally, horny old man, one part culture hero, another part hobo, who challenges other musicians to musical fights not unlike modern-day rap battles. He's doomed to never find love: one of his most tragic stories is his pursuit of a younger woman, Aino (still a common female name in Finland today) who drowns himself rather than marry a man so much older than she is.

Väinämöinen invented the Kantele, a type of magical harp not unlike the
cwyth of Wales, from the jawbone of the giant monster Pike of the North Sea. Väinämöinen also rides a flying wooden sawhorse, reminiscent of the witch's broomstick.

There's a type of picaresque humor about Finnish myth that makes it wonderful to read. Lemminkäinen, a hotshot young hero, lives with his Mother, and what's more, Mom has to rescue him on occasion and return him to life! (How many Scandinavian heroes lived with their Mother, I ask?) One of my favorite passages from the Kalevala was where Louhi, the evil crone that rules the Northland, turns a giant house-sized bear against her foes. Naturally Väinämöinen goes out to slay the monster. Instead, he has a change of heart:
"Otso, thou my well beloved,Honey-eater of the woodlands,Let not anger swell thy bosom;I have not the force to slay thee,Willingly thy life thou givestAs a sacrifice to Northland.Thou hast from the tree descended,Glided from the aspen branches,Slippery the trunks in autumn,In the fog-days, smooth the branches.Golden friend of fen and forest,In thy fur-robes rich and beauteous,Pride of woodlands, famous Light-foot,Leave thy cold and cheerless dwelling,Leave thy home within the alders,Leave thy couch among the willows,Hasten in thy purple stockings,Hasten from thy walks restricted,Come among the haunts of heroes,Join thy friends in Kalevala.We shall never treat thee evil,Thou shalt dwell in peace and plenty,Thou shalt feed on milk and honey,Honey is the food of strangers.Haste away from this thy covert,From the couch of the unworthy,To a couch beneath the raftersOf Vainola's ancient dwellings."- Kalevala, Rune XLVI
In other words, as soon as Väinämöinen gets a look at the monster bear, he says, "nah, I can't kill him, he's too cool" and instead decides to take him with him back to the land of Kalevala for some drinking and picking up girls. Now, obviously this is not exactly how St. George or Siegfried would have solved the problem! The last time I saw this sort of sly humanity in a monster was in Beowulf, where the dragon, indecisive and nervous about his lost treasure cup, paced back to his hoard and looked for it to see if it was not misplaced.
This sort of picaresque levity that almost parodies the epic myth is one point of difference between the myths of the Finns and their neighbors. It's hard to imagine an Icelandic Rune with a hero makes a monster his drinking buddy. And the Slavs? Forget about it. Slavic mythology, with gods named
Graak and
Kog, is so dark that it makes Norse Myth look like
Rainbow Brite.
There's only one occasion where the Kalevala gets extremely dark, and that's in the story of Kullervo. What's fascinating about Kullervo is, it's one of the few mythological stories that actually depicts the realistic effects of child abuse, and the very broken people it creates, trapped in cycles of self-destruction. In the end, Kullervo dies by his own hand when, after accidentally marrying his own sister, he mournfully wonders if he ever should have lived at all. Jean Sibelius, Finland's best composer, immortalized this moment in his opera, Kullervo:
3 comments:
"Naturally Väinämöinen goes out to slay the monster. Instead, he has a change of heart..."
Väinämöinen has actually just killed the bear but tells it that it died because of an accident. This part of Kalevala incorporates a number of shamanistic incantations of some description. Bear was an important totemic animal, and is was worshipped. So, killing a bear was a highly controversial act.
Later in the poem, the dead animal is the guest of honour in a feast where it is also the main course :-)
Is that what happened? Interesting!
I always had a feeling there was a shamanic significance about the death of Otso the Honey-Eater, particularly since it was never directly called a bear and they kept on calling it euphemisms. In a lot of ritual cultures where ritual bear death plays a role, it's considered bad luck to talk about a bear directly.
The best in mythology are in the old Kirby-Colletta THORS, don't you think? There are scans available for you to post.
Also, the Grell-Colletta Warlords were done in the same beautiful artistic style.
Post a Comment